So Saturday we went to see Obama speak. It was a great speech about listening to both sides of a debate and civility, trying to get away from sensationalist press.
But if you read about it in the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/02/us/politics/02obama.html?scp=1&sq=obama%20michigan&st=cse), you might have thought that we had to dodge the Tea party protesters just to get in the stadium. The New York Times article, referring to a "panoply of protesters shouting outside, many of them carrying signs decrying Mr. Obama as a 'socialist,'" made it seem like the liberals were inside the stadium, and the violent right-wingers were outside. NOT THE CASE!
Of the maybe 12 people protesting outside, 10 of them had signs protesting abortion, and 2 of them were Tea party folks protesting taxes.
The two Tea party protesters. What's the big deal?In fact, if you read the Annarbor.com article about it (http://www.annarbor.com/news/government/hundreds-rally-for-immigration-rights-outside-of-university-of-michigan-commencement/), you'd learn that the real protesting outside was for immigration reform - just like the protests happening all over the country on Saturday morning.
The idea of protesters name-calling Obama a "socialist" outside the stadium might be a good story that fits the national narrative, but in Ann Arbor on Saturday, it just wasn't the case.